|
|
Post by gforce on Oct 4, 2007 18:55:43 GMT -5
|
|
Bar Jedi
Moderator 
}}Force Power{96}
blink blink!
Posts: 374
|
Post by Bar Jedi on Oct 4, 2007 22:08:40 GMT -5
voiceovers or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by gforce on Oct 6, 2007 15:45:54 GMT -5
I am not sure since it has been a while since I have seen it. But I know this is Ridley Scott's Final Cut snd is supposed to be the most complete version and the same one that comes out on dvd on Dec 18.
|
|
Bar Jedi
Moderator
}}Force Power{96}
blink blink!
Posts: 374
|
Post by Bar Jedi on Oct 8, 2007 1:21:23 GMT -5
i really hated the fact that they took out the voiceovers in the release of the directors cut, granted the story was changed to imply that Dekker was a replicant but the voiceovers added so much to the story as far as background info was concerned!
|
|
Varekei
Moderator
}}Force Power{-2}
Posts: 452
|
Post by Varekei on Oct 8, 2007 17:51:27 GMT -5
What?! Dekker was supposed to be a replicant?! Since when?
What kind of drugs was I on when I saw this movie?
|
|
Bar Jedi
Moderator
}}Force Power{96}
blink blink!
Posts: 374
|
Post by Bar Jedi on Oct 8, 2007 22:26:51 GMT -5
i never really picked up on all of the hints, but alot of them had to with edward james almos' paper foldiongs and in some of what he said. also some of the images in the scenes that were added in the end also imply said replicant he was supposed to be.
aside from all that jazz, i wanna see the movie bad!!
|
|
|
|
Post by gforce on Oct 8, 2007 23:14:13 GMT -5
|
|
